Without this justification they are effectively out of business. AMP and Sovereign advisers that are contractually and financially tied into their restrictive product suite need to find some justification for why they can't offer the best product currently available in the market. Having worked as a tied adviser with AMP for many years,and only in the last 2 years having 'seen the light', I can understand where both sides of this argument are coming from. On 20 February 2013 at 9:06 am Goldstar said: Much history has already repeated itself, but at least if Kiwibank buys it the argument about financial strength will be over. Look at OnePath and their legacy of aggressive product and pricing and the changes they have also had to make in the last couple of years.įinally look at the board. Who really decides whether it's paid? And anyway, is there such a thing as a grey claim? The "grey claims thing" may or may not matter - but investigate the reinsurance arrangements. The products aren't that much better buying ratings by covering things that don't cause claims doesn't impress me - do your own research. Is it sustainable? Late last year they cranked up health premiums, cut upfront commissions and Rangatira pumped in $3.8M.īut Naomi knows what she is doing this is her 3rd time. So far Partner's story shows they are trying really hard, paying claims, delivering service, good products and pricing. ![]() In the initial stages any company that is pursuing growth wants to "prove" themselves. On 13 February 2013 at 11:54 am Dirty Harry said:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |